In my last post I stated that a company’s story needs to be well crafted in order to make a strong Brand impression. So then how does a company go about doing that?
Let’s start with Aaker’s brand model. Your story should begin with core and extended values which speak to your primary target market. Over this framework goes the flesh, so to speak, which are the four ways to enhance a Brand. They are: Brand as product/service , Brand as personality, Brand as organization, and Brand associations. It is likely that everyone of my previous posts(113 and counting) address this model in one way or another. Dr. Aaker rocks!
Now let’s slam the textbook shut and look at how we all do this every time we encounter a new person. Before the first word is spoken, we determine if this is someone we might like to know better (targeting). If so, we share only that information(story) we feel will show us in a positive light (brand identity). We may be charming or serious or humorous (brand personality). We may share that we are married or single (brand as organization). And to further enhance our story we may mention that we are in the Rotary or Toastmasters International (brand association). And we will certainly be trying to gauge our impact throughout the interaction and afterwards too (brand image).
We do this all day long in our personal lives. I am just trying to help people do it in their businesses.
And in a quick wink and a nod over my shoulder to my last post, perhaps none of what I just described is as important as listening attentively, with interest, to the story of a stranger (prospect:-).
XXX
Note to reader:
This is a continuation of drafts to be complied in what I now perceive as a white paper I hope to submit to brandchannel.com.
At this point, using this platform is adequate. When I begin to use graphics, I’ll most likely quit burdening my subscribers with these ramblings and move to Google Docs. But one advantage of this current format is it allows me the possibility of receiving feedback. If there is anything my readers agree or disagree with, or any aspect that is unclear, please let me hear from you.
Thank you.
XXX
Does a Brand exist if it cannot be retrieved from long-term memory?
No- As I’ll attempt to demonstrate more fully in subsequent posts.
Yes- When a brand name is given as a prompt and it is ‘recognized’ it can be said to exist. Also, a Brand perception not held by an individual, does exist in the minds of others.
I have written recently about the different usages, and over usage, of the word brand. For now, the “No” answer is strictly referring to capital B, Brand (the perception). The “Yes” answer is the word brand being used as synonymous with company. So, for example, Ford’s Brand is the perception of Ford. The brand Ford is the company.
Whether someone has heard a company name or not, the brand (company) certainly exists in all their tangible manifestations; their products, property, employees, etc. But there is retrieval by placing a prompt in short-term memory (recognition) and there’s retrieval by recall, a much higher level. For example, when contemplating a new car purchase, does Ford come to mind? It certainly does (the Brand) to most Americans, as it is a very strong brand (company). How you actually feel about Ford products, is the perception (Brand). {I intend to expand on this later. Another part of my thesis is that the over usages, or ubiquity, of the word brand has led to a lack of understanding of capital B, Brand.} More on this to follow.
xxx
A brief aside… It is every company’s desire to be perceived positively by everyone who has contact with their message. So strength of brand is not solely based on how many people can recognize or recall the brand name but how they feel about the company (brand). Therefore, how the Brand is perceived (positively or negatively) is more important to a company’s success than the reach of the Brand.
xxx
Now back to my “intersection”. Again, the vertical axis is Identity, the horizontal, Image.
I have reached the point where the intersection represented by a plus sign (+) represents a rather weak Brand. And a strong brand can be represented by the intersection conjured up by the logo of the International Red Cross. The width of the Identity axis is determined by the amount and effectiveness of the company’s message (values, promise, products, etc). And the width of the Image axis is determined by the reception (positive or negative) of the company’s message. A small company’s intersection=+ ; Apple’s Brand= think Red Cross.
The intersections will also vary because one axis will often be a different size than the other. A negative image of a global brand will have a fat vertical axis (they’re global) and a narrow horizontal axis(they’re not well liked). I also will use graphics to illustrate when no intersection exists.
Within each axis a list of those aspects belonging to them. Identity- Brand Mission, Promise, Personality, Position, etc.. Image- Brand Awareness, Reputation, Loyalty.